Home » Posts tagged 'Christian' (Page 3)
Tag Archives: Christian
THIS SIDE SODOM
HALIFAX, Nova Scotia, July 24, 2025 – I could have told them, if they’d asked me.
I could have told them that Halifax is just this side of Sodom now, and that to host a Christian worship concert here, especially during “Pride Week”, would bring out the worst in the locals, and they did not disappoint.
You don’t have to wonder what it was like for the disciples who went out two by two, under Jesus’ instruction, to preach the Good News. You don’t have to wonder what it was like for them to enter a town that was so opposed to their message that it ran them out. You don’t have to wonder what it was like, because it happened only yesterday in Halifax. You can read about it here. The site location permit for the concert was revoked less than a day before the event was supposed to take place. And just like that, the concert permits in neighboring cities were also revoked, all for the same reason: “safety and security considerations” due to planned protests against the concert and its attendees.
Jesus directed his disciples not to argue with those who rejected the Good News and not to stay where the message wasn’t welcome. Instead, the disciples were instructed to respond to the rejection by shaking the dust of the place from the bottom of their feet and leaving more or less like Lot left Sodom – hastily, and with no plans to return.
Once a formerly Christian place has gone demonic, as Halifax has—as most places in Canada have—there’s no going back. It’s like a fallen angel or a born-again believer who loses grace. Time’s up for that place; there’ll be no more do-overs, no reclaiming what is irretrievably lost. It’s Satan’s turf now, and he won it fair and square. Paul explains that God permits these people to wallow in their sin, since sin is what they’ve chosen. He respects their free-will right to reject him and his Word, and as difficult as it can be for us at times, we must also respect their free-will right to reject God and Jesus, and let the sinners be.
I’m only here in this almost-God-forsaken place as long as God wants me here. Once he gives me the signal, I’m gone.
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES
Here’s an amazing video, sent to me by a reader in Calgary, Alberta.
The video has a surprise ending, so watch to the end!
Enjoy!
ON SHARING AND FAIRING
HALIFAX, Nova Scotia, July 21, 2025 – I’ve never been good at random sharing because I don’t always see sharing as being fair. What I have always been good at is “fairing”, which means giving others a fair deal that we’ve all agreed on. I believed in fairing even before I was a believer.
In scripture, a good example of fairing is the employer who hires people to labor in his fields, offering them all the same daily wage. They all agree to the wage, but when it comes time to pay the laborers, some of them become miffed because they’re getting the same daily wage as laborers who only worked a fraction of the time they did. The miffed workers believe that because they worked more hours and under worse conditions, they should be entitled to more pay, even though they agreed to their daily wage before they started working.
According to fairing, everyone who labored got a fair wage because it was precisely the wage they’d agreed upon. It wasn’t imposed on them; they agreed to it.
Another example of fairing is the parable of the ten virgins and their oil lamps. As scripture tells us, five of the virgins were wise and five were foolish. The wise had oil in their lamps and the foolish didn’t, so the foolish foolishly presumed that the wise should share their oil with them. But the wise virgins told the foolish ones that they wouldn’t share their oil (why should they, if it would be to their detriment?), so if the foolish virgins wanted oil, they should go buy it for themselves.
I love these parables because they fly in the face of “worldly wisdom”, which is that everyone is owed whatever they want just for existing, and that those who have more (the so-called privileged) must give to those who have less (the so-called underprivileged) for no other reason than those who have less have less. The idea underlying this perspective is that everyone (meaning the masses) should have more or less the same, regardless of ability, aptitude, effort, or need. To the world, the wise virgins not sharing their oil is an outrage that needs to be rectified, and by force, if necessary. Wage parity, undergirded by mass third-world migration and DEI, is the wise virgins being forced to share their oil at gunpoint.
As I said at the outset, I’m not good at sharing just for the sake of sharing, but I have nothing against sharing if it’s done fairly and wisely and according to God’s guidance. If I have two coats, and God indicates that I should give one of them to someone who has no coat, I share my coats, no questions asked. If I have an extra room in my house, and God indicates that I should offer that room to someone who has nowhere to live, then I offer that room to that person. I don’t run around looking for someone to give a coat to or offer a room to; I share with whomever God indicates I should share with. This is how we share fairly and wisely as followers of Jesus, not followers of the world.
The virgins were wise not only because they had oil in their lamps when they needed it, but because they chose not to share that oil when they were goaded and guilted into doing so. It’s not wise to give what God hasn’t guided you to give, or you’ll end up with less than what you need, which is not God’s intention for you. It’s not Christian to give what God hasn’t guided you to give, or you’ll do more harm than good, not only to the recipient, but to yourself.
Share, but share fairly and wisely, as God guides you.
UPDATE ON MALACHY’S PROPHECY: POPE LEO THE 14th DECLARES HIMSELF “ROMAN”
HALIFAX, Nova Scotia, May 30, 2025 – They’re just trolling us now, right?
A few days ago, after allegedly tying up the last of the loose ends that had to be dealt with before officially becoming the Bishop of Rome, newly minted Pope Leo the 14th came right out and declared: “I AM ROMAN!” With his declaration, Prevost (who, by anagram, is Petros [Greek form of Peter] and the 112th—and last—pope on Malachy’s list of papal rulers) now fully satisfies the criteria for the prophesied and doomed Peter the Roman.
In case you have no idea what I’m talking about, see here, here, here, and here.
Again, the ptb must be trolling us by screaming the quiet part out so loud that even the sleepiest prophecy-watcher dozing in the back row will wake up and take notice.
Does the “Roman declaration” confirm that Leo the 14th has been tapped to play the role of the final papal sovereign? If the answer is ‘yes’, we now have a general timeframe not only for the destruction of Roman Catholicism but also for the destruction of Rome. The Malachy prophecy dovetails with other well-known visions, such as Pope Leo the 13th’s vision in the Vatican chapel (in 1884) and Sister Lucia’s vision at Fatima (in 1917), that describe both the end of the worldly church and the annihilation of Rome, along with the mass slaughter of clergy and believers.
The general timeframe for all this destruction is Leo the 14th’s lifespan. He’s currently 69.
While I don’t believe that the above-mentioned prophecies and visions come from God through his Holy Spirit, I do believe that God is permitting them to serve as a blueprint for Satan’s plans of how and when he intends to destroy the worldly church, along the lines of “smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered”. And though the destruction of the worldly church won’t impact the spiritual sanctuary of us born-again believers (our Church existed prior to the worldly church and will exist after it, right up until Jesus comes back to take the last of us Home), its absence will make it trickier for us to live openly in the world as believers. By “trickier”, I mean dangerous—deadly dangerous—like it was for the early Church.
Jesus told us to watch for signs of the end, as those will presage his second coming and God’s final Judgement. That’s what I’m doing here: watching and reporting on what I see. The credible fulfillment of the Malachy prophecy takes us a giant step closer to the implementation of the beast system but also a giant step closer to Jesus’ return. Being Jesus’ followers, we naturally focus on the latter event, but we still need to be aware of what, according to scripture, must come before.
ENTERTAINING DEVILS
HALIFAX, Nova Scotia, May 17, 2025 – This is one of the more difficult articles I’ve had to write for this blog. It’s a touchy subject, but it needs to be aired. It concerns our interactions with people who are not born-again and have no interest in becoming born-again. In other words, it concerns nearly everyone we come into contact with every day and therefore it concerns our day-to-day lives. How we deal with these people can make or break us spiritually, so listen up.
As always, we need to look to Jesus first and foremost to see how he interacted with those around him. How did Jesus treat people who had no desire to know and love God? Did he force himself on them, following them around and pestering them with Bible quotes? Did he slip a Gospel teaching into his conversations with them without their knowing it? Or did he go all Bible-thumping fire and brimstone and warn them that they’d burn in hell unless they followed him? The answer is, of course, “no”, Jesus didn’t do any of those things. He didn’t even stop his followers from leaving him, if they wanted to leave. He didn’t chase after them and try to entice them back into the fold. He just let them go. Jesus’ focus, as should be ours, was to teach those who free-willingly came to him with the right motivation.
But what about people who try to attach themselves to us with the wrong motivation, who don’t know God and Jesus and have no desire to know them? If you’ve been born-again for any amount of time, you’ll likely have noticed that you’ve become a magnet for… certain people. They may be family members or perhaps they’re friends or acquaintances you knew prior to your rebirth, but what they all have in common is a desire to insert themselves into your life, even if you haven’t seen them or spoken to them in years. In most cases, these people are unaware that they’re being used spiritually to entice you into behaviors you left behind when you were born-again. But they’re persistent, these people, and they typically use as a hook your shared personal history with them.
Again, these are not people who are coming to you because they crave what you have spiritually; they’re coming to take away what you have spiritually—to find chinks in your spiritual armor to exploit—so you need to be very cautious around them.
Still, a few relationships are inviolable, regardless of whether these people are reborn or not. I’m referring here to your relationship with your mother and father. The Commandment says we’re to honor our parents, so we’re to honor them, no exceptions. We honor them by interacting with them respectfully and speaking kindly of them to others, even if they give Jack the Ripper a run for his money. This directive to honor our mother and father comes directly from God and therefore is inviolable. Break it at your extreme peril.
But beyond our mother and father, God gives us no directives other than to treat people as we would want to be treated. I like people to be polite to me, so I’m polite to them. I like people to be honest with me, so I’m honest with them. But I don’t necessarily need to be kind when kindness isn’t called for, though whatever I say or do, I say or do it with the aim of maintaining a clear conscience and right-standing before God. This may look like standoffish-ness or even outright rudeness, but we have no directive from God to cater to people’s whims and demands on our time. Just because someone reaches out to us doesn’t mean we have to respond, if we know their motivation for reaching out is not good, is not godly. And we can know their motivation is not godly because God gives us discernment to know.
Many people cried out to Jesus as he walked from village to village, but he only responded to and spent time with those who wanted what he was offering. He didn’t force the Gospel on people; he shared it with those who free-willingly came to him with godly intent. Every day, we interact with dozens if not hundreds of people, most if not all of whom want nothing to do with God and Jesus. They’re not coming to us to hear the Gospel. Some will even target us, intentionally or unintentionally trying to harm us spiritually. We’ll know who these people are when they come around; they’re not hard to discern. The bait and hooks are nearly always the same. If you spend even a small amount of time with them, they’ll give you a sense that you’re being dragged down because they are dragging you down. That’s their motivation, whether they know it or not. And that’s how you know you can’t be around them.
You have no directive from God to be around certain people just because they want to be around you. If they don’t want God and Jesus, they want your harm: There’s no other way to put it. Be polite, but steer clear of them. You don’t even have to tell them why you’re steering clear of them. They are a test and a temptation and a constant moral hazard.
As a born-again believer, you have no obligation to entertain devils.
So don’t.
MASS IMMIGRATION: GOD’S WILL OR AN EARNED EVIL?
HALIFAX, Nova Scotia, May 13, 2025 – A general spiritual rule of thumb is that nearly everything the world promotes and values is contrary to the will of God. By “the world”, I’m referring here mainly to Western civilization, since the West more than any other part of the world has gone off the deep end lately and gotten itself into some major spiritual doo-doo, and that well earned. If something is contrary to the will of God but has been earned, God will permit it. He doesn’t will it, he permits it. This distinction is important.
For instance, God doesn’t will mass immigration into Western nations, but he does permit it as an earned negative reward. Not to permit it would be contrary to his justice. And so, taking their cue from their satanic overlords and with the encouragement of religious and cultural organizations of every stripe and creed, Western governments have rolled out the red carpet for “whosoever will”, regardless of merit. Formerly rigorous processes that lasted years have been thrown out in favor of instant permanent residency and full generous financial support upon arrival, with very few applicants being turned away. Of course, people are taking advantage of the largesse (who wouldn’t?), counting on overwhelmed and backlogged immigration systems to give them at least three to four years of relative luxury (compared to what they’re used to back home) before their case is reviewed and decided. And even when cases are rejected, the appeals process can take years, during which time the good times continue to roll for the applicants, who then become so deeply rooted and established in their adopted country that to uproot them would be (according to their taxpayer-funded lawyer) tantamount to a crime against humanity.
This is the state of mass immigration today in the West through all the various channels (refugee, asylum-seeker, international student, foreign worker, etc.), and if for all intents and purposes it appears to be a taxpayer-funded invasion, that’s because it is a taxpayer-funded invasion. And with God’s permission. Not God’s will, but his permission. The invasion of incompatible people into the West who hate the West and only want to take advantage of the West has been earned spiritually by the West (see Deuteronomy 28) and therefore will not only continue but worsen as the spiritual health of the West continues its precipitous decline.
All this madness has been lumped together by Western governments and religious leaders under the soft-sell heading of “immigration” and is being promoted as a “core Western value”, even as it all but destroys the host countries it afflicts. The Lord moves in mysterious ways, but the devil is upfront about his devilry for those who have eyes to see. The irony is that being permitted by God as an expression of his justice and being orchestrated by the devil under God’s strict authority, mass immigration must occur. It cannot not occur, not according to God’s justice. There is no way around mass immigration into the West, not with the current spiritual state of the West and its future projected trend.
The irony is also that to be against mass immigration as it’s playing out today in the West is to be against God’s justice. Does that mean we, as born-again believers, should promote and support mass immigration? As Paul would say: “God forbid!” Just because God permits something as a negative reward doesn’t mean we should embrace it or enable it in any way. To embrace or enable a negative reward is to work against God. Our job, as born-again believers, is to let God’s justice play out, not fight against it. We’re to endure negative rewards, not promote them – we’re to endure them, not hinder them: We’re to endure them, and by enduring them suffer patiently to the extent that we’ve earned them. That is God’s justice, and we’re all subject to God’s justice. No exceptions.
Accordingly, we should never morally, financially, or any other way support charities, including churches, that promote mass immigration. What God wills is not the same as what God permits, and God is permitting mass immigration into the West by incompatible peoples as a negative reward for a spiritual falling away from all that is good and holy. In other words, he’s giving people in the West the fruit of their choices – a nation without God, where people ruled over by demons rule over them. If we support and enable the fruit of sin, we’re supporting and enabling sin. Obviously, as born-again believers, we shouldn’t do that.
And yes, Joseph and Mary fled with Jesus to Egypt, but they were a case of an individual family fleeing imminent slaughter – genuine refugeeism – not mass opportunistic country-shopping. Jacob’s family was also accepted in Egypt under the auspices of both Joseph and the then pharaoh, but again, this was a case of an individual family facing a life-or-death circumstance (famine-induced starvation); it wasn’t mass immigration of aptly named “gimmegrants” country-hopping to find the most generous benefits for them and their extended families. Genuine refugees we should continue to welcome; if God has willed that they come, we need to welcome them. But mass immigration God has not willed.
Mass immigration is a God-sanctioned negative reward that we, as born-again believers, should endure but not support. As a negative reward, mass immigration will affect each of us personally to the extent that we’ve earned it. We need to accept it, not fight against it, as it is God’s justice manifesting in real time. We must never fight against God’s justice no matter how much of an injustice it superficially appears to be. We need to be spiritually aware of why things are the way they are so that we aren’t unknowingly drawn into rebelling against God’s justice and therefore rebelling against God.
Have the wisdom and patience of saints, not the knee-jerk elbows-up response of the world.
SOCIAL MEDIA, GOSSIP, AND BEARING FALSE WITNESS
HALIFAX, Nova Scotia, May 11, 2025 – The Ten Commandments are non-negotiable, which we, as born-again believers, well know. Every Commandment needs to be kept to the best of our ability, no excuses and no exceptions. The Commandments that garner the most attention (e.g., the ones about not killing and not committing adultery) tend to overshadow the less oft-cited Commandments and push them farther away from our spiritual awareness. But all the Commandments need to be kept, not just the “sexy” ones.
One of those less oft-cited Commandments is the one about not bearing false witness against your neighbor. In fact, it’s so overshadowed at times by the other Commandments that it’s even been misconstrued on occasion as “Thou shalt not lie”, which is not what the Commandment states. The Commandment is not about not lying: It’s about not bearing false witness, which, though it can share some characteristics with lying, is in a separate category by itself or it wouldn’t be a Commandment.
Bearing false witness against your neighbor can manifest in two different ways: 1) purposely twisting or omitting facts to cast guilt on an innocent person, either in a court of law or in the court of public opinion; or 2) openly speculating, again either in a court of law or in the court of public opinion, about the probable or possible guilt of someone, based solely on your opinion of the presented or presumed facts.
This article concerns the second violation of the Commandment, specifically, open speculation in the court of public opinion.
We all speculate. It’s not wrong to speculate. When we hear of a crime or a potential crime, we speculate as a way to make sense of the mystery that we’ve been presented with and don’t yet have a solution for, not being privy to all the facts of the case. Speculation in and of itself is not wrong. God gave us a mind and intends for us to use it. But speculation that involves the possible or probable guilt of someone we only suspect might be guilty should be kept between us and God. The instant we go beyond God and openly share our speculations on someone’s presumed guilt, we enter the realm of bearing false witness against a neighbor. We cross the line and we break the Commandment.
In the interests of full disclosure, I have crossed that line and nearly crossed that line on numerous occasions without realizing it. Case in point: Two children, age four and six, have gone missing from a rural community in Nova Scotia. This happened about a week ago, and speculation on social media has been rife with unsubstantiated claims about what could have happened to the little ones. Having lived for a time not far from where the children disappeared, I was immediately drawn to the case; and being a woman with latent but still intact maternal instincts, I also became emotionally involved with it. For every fact about the disappearance that trickled out through mainstream media, social media responded with a flood of what can only be described as salacious speculation. No-one who had access to the children before their disappearance was spared public pillorying. Given my emotional involvement, it was difficult for me not to get caught up in the rumors and innuendoes, and so I did get caught up in them, until God hauled me up short and showed me what I was setting myself up for.
I did not get involved in the public speculation about what happened to those children (who, at the time of publication, are still missing). When I say I didn’t get involved publicly, I mean I didn’t submit a comment on any of the social media forums or talk about the case with anyone. I kept my speculations to myself, but I was tempted on many an occasion to jump into the online discussions that form the widespread court of public opinion. I was tempted. I was very tempted. And I thank God I didn’t do it.
When we speculate between us and God, God will guide our speculations, if we ask him to guide us and if it’s to our benefit. God decides on both of those criteria. But when we breach the containment of our mind and shift to openly speculating in the court of public opinion, we run the risk of breaking the Commandment about bearing false witness against our neighbor. No, I don’t know the people involved in the case of the missing children in Nova Scotia, but they’re still my neighbors, according to Jesus’ definition. And no, the court of public opinion doesn’t take place in a designated court of law, but it still has the same spiritual impact. Even if you believe your speculations to be accurate and the person or people you’re speculating about to be guilty, you need to keep your speculations between you and God. You’ll be tempted not to, but you need to keep them between you and God. The minute you voice your opinion publicly (even just among friends and family), you cross the line and break the Commandment.
But what if your suspicions end up being correct? What if you’ve uncovered an angle that doesn’t appear to have been considered by law enforcement agents? What if your witness isn’t false? Are you still breaking the Commandment if you share what turns out to be true?
As long as the case being speculated upon is still in the realm of speculation (that is, hasn’t yet been solved beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law), you need to be very careful about what you share and how you share it. You can share your personal revelations without pointing fingers, but that’s a very tricky process that borders on breaking the Commandment. You can do it but be very careful. Unless you are an eyewitness and are 100% certain about what you saw, you are treading a very fine line that may wrongly implicate someone, which will then rebound to you spiritually and cause you enormous suffering.
There are no exceptions when it comes to keeping God’s Ten Commandments. The devil is always laying traps and offering temptations to get us to violate God’s rules, so we need not only to be aware of the Commandments at all times but to understand what each one looks like when it’s walked out in real life. If God hadn’t shown me, I would never have connected spit-balling someone’s possible guilt with violating the Commandment about bearing false witness. I would just have thought of it as discussing possibilities with people who are also discussing possibilities. But all words, whether spoken or written, have an impact on the hearers and readers, swaying them this way or that. You don’t want to be the one swaying someone to a conclusion that falsely accuses another of a crime, because you’ll be held responsible for that false accusation by God, which will have a far worse outcome for you, as a born-again believer, than if you’d committed the discussed crime yourself.
Be very careful of what you say and write. It’s better to keep things between you and God than to climb onboard the gossip train of social media and fall into the devil’s trap of bearing false witness.
HABEMUS PAPAM: POPE PETER THE ROMAN
HALIFAX, Nova Scotia, May 8, 2025 – So, we have our Pope Peter the Roman after all, hidden (as they say) in plain sight.
“Prevost” is an anagram of “Petros V”, and “petros” is the Greek form of “Peter”.
Definition auto-compiled from two websites (one, two):
Petros is a name of Greek origin that means “rock”. It is an alternate form of Peter. The name derives from Latin “petra” (Petrus), from the Ancient Greek “petra” / “Petros”, from the Aramaic word “kephas”, which in turn derives from the Syriac “kefa”, all words meaning “stone, rock”.
“Kephas”, of course, is what Jesus surnamed his disciple Simon, the one we know as Peter and allegedly the first pope.
Pope Petros, who is of Italian heritage, will now sit in Rome, satisfying the prophecy for “Peter the Roman” in every conceivable way.
In case you’re new to this game, here is the last verse of Malachy’s prophecy, translated into English:
“In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will sit Peter the Roman, who will pasture his sheep in many tribulations, and when these things are finished, the city of seven hills will be destroyed, and the dreadful judge will judge his people. The End.”
So again, there we have it. They done did it. They followed the script to the letter, and now, I guess, we’re doomed.
Pope Petros is 69. I give him 20-25 years at most, which gives the rest of us about 20-25 years before the “S” really Hits The Fan.
Remember – this is a script they’re following. It’s not a prophecy; it’s a script.
Malachy might have intended it as a prophecy, but they’re following it as a script.
As my grandmother would say (if she spoke Latin): Deus adiuvet nos omnes.
THIS IS THE STONE
HALIFAX, Nova Scotia, May 7, 2025 – For whatever time we have left here, we’re tasked with doing what’s right in the eyes of the Lord. That’s our job description – “Do God’s Will” – which encompasses all the other non-negotiables, like the Commandments and loving our enemies.
But doing what’s right in the eyes of the Lord is guaranteed going to put us at odds with those who don’t do what’s right, and those who don’t do what’s right are guaranteed going to be in positions of authority over us, pressuring us by various means to abide by their commands, not God’s.
We’re well acquainted with this pressure as born-again believers. It’s our everyday lived reality. What can only be described as Satan’s commandments have been enshrined in constitutions and laws, embedded in educational systems, promoted by all forms of media, and established as societal norms. Standing up for God now means standing against the whole of society, which can be daunting for some (it’s meant to be; it’s a test) but should never be for us. We are like David standing before Goliath armed with nothing but faith and trust and a sling and a few stones. But faith and trust in God won’t work without the sling and stones, any more than the sling and stones will work without faith and trust in God.
Being in the realm of time and space, we must put our belief (faith and trust) into action (sling and stones) or it has no value. It’s all well and good to declare that you have faith and trust in God even as you hang up your sling and mount your stones in a display case, saying “I’ve done what I’ve had to do; now it’s time to enjoy the fruits of my labor”. There will never be a time when we’ll be able to hang up our sling and mothball our stones, not while we’re here on Earth; we can put them down for a breather, yes, after each victory or loss, but we’ll always have to keep them in readiness for the next battle, which will likely come tomorrow or even later today.
For each of us, our sling is different; our stones are different. We fight the same battles using diverse tools, as God gives us the ability and guidance. My sling doesn’t look like yours, my stones don’t look like yours, but our faith and trust in God unfolds like fractals from the same source. There is only one God and therefore only one kind of faith and only one kind of trust because it comes from the same Spirit. Our faith and trust in God may differ in measure and degree, but in every other way they’re the same. They’re what bind us to each other spiritually and identify us as children of God and citizens of God’s Kingdom on Earth.
To the followers of Satan’s commands, our sling and stones are unsettling reminders of what they’ve rejected and what awaits them after death. Their ridicule of us and of what’s right in God’s eyes is a fear response. It’s delivered via arrogance and pride and dismissiveness and threats, but underneath is only fear. Terrified of God’s Judgement, they deny the existence of both God and his Judgement and declare there is nothing to fear but fear itself. They make themselves the law and their will the constitution and their desires the norm, but none of these things come from them: they all come from Satan.
This is the stone I shoot today. May it find its mark in the designated forehead. We are to fear, yes, but God and God only. Satan we’re only to pity.
“Forgive them, Father. They don’t know what they’re doing.”
PICKING FROM A PECK OF PAPAL PETERS
HALIFAX, Nova Scotia, May 4, 2025 – Pardon me if I’m not supposed to notice, but aren’t there an awful lot of papabile Peters in the 2025 conclave? I’m sure it doesn’t have anything to do with Malachy’s prophecy of “Peter the Roman” being the 112th (*see note below) and final pope, and it’s likely all just a coincidence. Nothing to see here, folks; move along. But still, I can’t help but notice all the Peters surging to the forefront of the betting odds… and what are the odds of THAT?
I wrote two and a half months ago, when Bergoglio was still warming Peter’s seat (or better said, lukewarming it), that the next pope will likely be a Peter. It could be someone who was christened Peter at birth, or it could be someone who takes the name of Peter after being crowned pope (I say “crowned”, but they don’t actually do that anymore to emperors, I mean popes, at least not publicly). No pope has yet to take the name of Peter, allegedly out of deference to the original Peter. If someone who wasn’t christened Peter at birth becomes the next pope and takes the name of Peter, well, it might not yet be time to head for the hills, but you could consider sleeping with your running shoes on.
Here, in ranked order, is the latest list of the men most likely to be crowned pope in the 2025 conclave, according to a global betting site. Note that “Peter” can be spelled differently, depending on the language.
- Pier Parolin
- Luis Antonio Tagle
- Mateo Zuppi
- Peter Turkson
- Robert Sarah
- Pierbattista Pizzaballa
- Peter Erdo
Of these top seven contenders, four are Peters. I would wager that this many Peters on the papal short-list has never happened before.
What are we to make of it? Just a “coincidence”? Or is the Peter the Roman prophecy being force-fed into the pope-picking process because the scripted end is upon us?
Me, I’m rolling for Peter Pizzaballa becoming the next Big Cheese, solely because his name makes me hungry for pizza. That, and because Pizzaballa is currently the head honcho (Head Cheese? lol groan) of the Catholics in the very place where scripture tells us Peter actually was the head honcho for a time – Jerusalem. So, if the next pope is an Italian named Peter who already sits in the historically and scripturally designated seat of Peter in Jerusalem, then I’d say all the boxes (pizza boxes?) are checked for Malachy’s “Peter the Roman” prophecy coming to life. And it would be just the icing on the cake (or dare I suggest, extra cheese on the pie?) if all this happened now, at the 2025 conclave, given that humanity has recently been handed its eviction notice due to the allegedly impending polar shift that’s going to wipe most of us out in as little as 4 to 6 years.
The 2025 conclave starts in three days. Let’s see what happens.
In the meantime, for your viewing and listening pleasure, here’s a little ditty serenading pizza at a bakery in Peter Pizzaballa’s hometown of Bergamo, Italy. Enjoy!
ll fornaio pizza Bergamo Italy #shorts – YouTube
(* The next pope will be the112th from the time the prophecy was issued, if you count the Bergoglio papacy as invalid, as numerous priests have done and have been excommunicated for their efforts.)
